What's the difference between Carbon Removal & Carbon Capture? Nicole Kelner lays it out for us in this week’s 1-Minute Climate Snippet.
Carbon capture and carbon removal are often used interchangeably. They both help eradicate carbon in the air, however, they are very different in both premise and execution.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The difference between carbon removal and carbon capture <a href="https://t.co/PJ7jJoQy5f">pic.twitter.com/PJ7jJoQy5f</a></p>— Nicole Kelner (@NicoleKelner) <a href="https://twitter.com/NicoleKelner/status/1507010318605565964?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2022</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Using Nicole Kelner’s art as a reference point, we can see that carbon removal “sucks” existing Co2 from the air rather than preventing it. While carbon capture, on the other hand, “scrubs” Co2 from the source.
While both are effective in different ways, carbon removal is used for targeting existing emissions and carbon capture lowers the initial carbon footprint of traditional carbon-intensive industries.
Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) are a promising sustainable solution. These fuels can either be biofuels or synfuels, which can be used without modifying existing aircraft
In this snippet, we’ll explore how AI is revolutionizing the field of weather prediction and how it can impact the renewable energy industry.